Dot Org Web Works
  • Portfolio
    • Portfolio At-a-Glance
    • Archived
  • About Us
    • Charity Websites Design
    • Our Team
    • Client List
    • FAQ
    • Payments to DOWW
    • Contact Us
      • Support Request
  • Your New Website
      • Nonprofit Web Development Starting Point
      • Website Ideas: The Essentials
      • Options
      • Afterward
      • Pricing
      • Website Maintenance Plans
      • Logo Design
      • Website Builder
      • Resource Links
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Facebook
  • Mail

All In One Calendar

July 4, 2012/0 Comments/in App Spotlight, News/by webguy

spot-calendarThe All-in-One Calendar is one of those plugins that one has to believe was specially developed for event-heavy nonprofits in mind.  It easily, and beautifully, allows one to find and share events. Already installed and running on more than 20,000 websites, and translated into 11 languages, the All-in-One Calendar is purportedly one of the most feature-rich calendar systems in the world. We’ve tried it on a couple of our client webs, and we think it’s pretty cool. Go to: http://time.ly to download it for free.

 

Online Donation Services Compared

June 30, 2012/0 Comments/in News/by webguy

I often receive solicitations from service providers who’ve got something they’re sure my clients will benefit from. So when an email from AffiniPay graced my email box last month, I nearly tossed it out, out of habit, until I saw that it was for a donation processing service. You see, one of my clients had recently commented to me about how he was canceling his service, with a well known provider, because of their high monthly rate and commissions. So, I let fate have its way and opened the solicitation. “Cool, at least it’s not a form letter,” I thought to myself.

donation-servicesAnyway, what the sales rep had to offer was another avenue for nonprofits to receive credit card donations: online, via a (PC) plug-in reader, or from a traditional credit card terminal. However, what grabbed my attention was their processing fee of only 2.19% (plus twenty cents per item). And if you compare that to, let’s say, Qgiv.com’s transaction fee of 3.95% (plus twenty-five cents per item), along with their hefty start-up cost and monthly fee, the AffiniPay option shines.

I decided to check into it.

Naturally, the first thing I did was to visit their website. On the plus side, their niche is servicing associations and nonprofits. On the down side, their website looks like a credit union employee put it together over the weekend using a template.  Okay, I let that slide since the website did explain their services fairly well and provided several customer testimonials. (I tracked down a few of them for comment. More on that in a moment.)

In my email reply to the sales representative, I confirmed their processing commissions (the percentage they keep for themselves), set-up, and monthly fees. I checked to see if donors automatically receive a receipt; I checked into client reports and checked out a couple of other must have features. The sales rep responded within the same day, confirming that AffiniPay does not have a set up fee and their monthly service fee is only $15. (The processing fee of 2.19% is for Visa, MasterCard, and Discover, and about 2.89% for Amex.) She explained that they have live customer support, each customer get’s their own representative, all transactions are on their secured servers (no need to set-up a security certificate one on the client’s website), and all fees are taken out at the end of the month, so all donations are recorded in whole!

Well, this sounded quit good. So I checked with the standard bearers of the industry to see what they offer. Here’s how they compared:

 

SERVICE PROVIDER Network for Good Qgiv PayPal AffiniPay
Service Account Name / Type “Donate Now” default “Payments Standard” “Gateway”
Set Up Fee (one time) $199.00 $199.00 none None*
Monthly Fees $49.95 $25.00 none $15.00
Transaction Commission Per Donation 3.00% 3.95% 2.90% 2.19%
Transaction Fee Per Donation none $0.25 $0.30 $0.20
Donation Page Portal (with client info) yes yes manual yes
Donation Tracking Reports yes yes monthly statement yes
Automatic Receipt to Donors yes yes regular receipt yes
Event Ticketing Solutions yes yes manual no
Annual Contract none none none none
Example Fee on a $500 Donation $15.00 $20.00 $14.80 $11.15
* For those who wish to have the recurring payment option, there is a one-time set up fee of $150.

After I ran the math, I contacted two current and one former customer. The later had left AffiniPay for another service that was better able to work within their database’s framework. The former customer was, however, quick to praise their overall services, fees and customer support. The two active customers also had no reservations about referring AffiniPay to any small to medium sized organization.

To sum it up, I think AffiniPay is certainly worth checking into. It could save your organization a good deal of money each year. Funds that will, no doubt, be put to better use.

Social Marketing for Nonprofits

November 29, 2011/0 Comments/in News/by webguy
By Katie Bess, MSW, and Gary Bess, PhD

A new era has developed where social media, including web and mobile technologies, have turned communication into an interactive dialogue, surpassing the days when telephone, letters, and in-person communication were the conventional ways to interact. Today, we can have social interaction no matter where we are in the world with just a mobile smart phone. We are moving into a generation where social media is taking over and expanding the ways in which we communicate. How can we use this new and powerful resource to promote and advance the world of nonprofit organizations?

The social media environment is expanding the way nonprofit organizations administer their services, communicate with stakeholders, and manage the relationships they have with other nonprofits and community members. It is an inexpensive and powerful networking tool to promote nonprofit interests by informing and empowering constituencies and supporters to raise money for services, advocate for important issues, or simply remain connected to the nonprofit’s mission.  Whether your organization’s goals are to promote policy, advocate for a specific cause or a high-risk population, or to provide direct services, social media can help  promote awareness about the issue and the need.

Through Internet and mobile smart phones, social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter allow the user to send instant updates (aka Live Feed) with the intent that  your subscriber audience will immediately observe what you posted. This is a great way to get information out in a timely fashion to a large and presumed supportive audience. Social media platforms such as Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and blogs can be easily added to an organization’s webpage, which remains the repository of key facts and organizational background information, and makes it even easier for your constituents and those interested to remain current on issues of importance to the agency.

Social media can provide many benefits for nonprofits. It can foster collaboration opportunities with other nonprofits, for-profits and governmental organizations by instantly providing information on important cause-related topics and issues in which the organization is currently involved in an easily accessible way.  It affords others the opportunity to provide support, fresh ideas and feedback on topics of common interest. For example, if your organization is working to pass a resolution or oppose a particular bill and you need people and/or organizations to quickly sign on and lend their support in little time, providing an instant message to your members will quickly spread the word.

It is important to keep your audience interested and engaged in your organization or informational campaign by providing a place for the audience to discuss issues. This can be accomplished by linking a social networking platform (i.e. Facebook, Twitter, blog) to your nonprofit’s webpage. Posting questions on specific topics that relate to your nonprofit agency’s mission or practices, and asking for feedback from your audience of their views on the issue are ways to link your webpage to social media platforms.  You can encourage a rich, interactive and vibrant environment for sharing information while sustianing support for your organization.

These opportunities for immediate engagement also come with potential risks, though if you are vigilantly aware, there are multiple ways to avoid them.  A key component in avoiding risks is creation of a social media strategy that anticipates possible problems in addition to strategic actions.  Developing and carrying out a social media strategy will assure your attainment of organizational goals, implementation of measurable objectives and overall delivery of performance, while safeguarding against potentially harmful comments that others make.  The social media strategy may include, for example, daily updates to webpages and other social media sites, weekly blasts to constituents, and daily reviews of new posts to ensure appropriateness of comments.  Many organizations are also including social marketing as a part of their agency’s strategic plan as there is a logical fit with several key plan directives that range from fund development to advocacy to service integration.

To avoid potential risks once a social media strategy is implemented, stay active on the webpage and platforms (e.g., regularly review interactions / responses), and answer a respondent’s question or acknowledge a respondent’s statement in a timely matter. Since you cannot control what is said by your audience, it is important to control for inappropriate or harmful statements, which you can either refute or delete.  Hypothetically, if someone posted something on your nonprofit social networking site that wasn’t appropriate (i.e., expressed displeasure with a seminar  attended or service received,  or posted something that was against the nonprofit’s purpose), it’s best to stay active on the platform to either immediately delete the comment or provide a public response to the comment. Providing a public response will show your organization’s openness to other opinions and reinforce the issue, while assuring that everyone’s voices are heard.

While using social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, it is important to remember that social media is another representation of your organization and therefore should be handled carefully as to not publicly post or provide information that is against your organization’s mission, goals or image. With that said, this is an exciting new era that can provide many benefits to nonprofit organizations.

For more information regarding social media resources, strategy templates and training materials, please visit: http://www.wearemedia.org/. We Are Media, a social media blog in of itself, provides a community of people from nonprofits that are interested in learning and teaching social media strategies and and offers tools for organizations like yours.

Authors

Katie Bess, MSW, currently serves as the Washington D.C. representative for the National Association for Rural Mental Health (NARMH), is a research assistant with the National Association of Counties (NACo) and a senior policy intern with the National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors (NACBHDD).

Gary Bess, PhD, is the principal in Gary Bess Associates (GBA), established n 1991, a nonprofit and government consulting firm that specialized is grant writing, needs assessment and nonprofit management. For several years he directed free medical clinics in southern California, including the South Bay Free Clinic in Manhattan Beach and the Los Angeles Free Clinic, and building on this experience, GBA specialized in applications for Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) designation and renewals.

hyper-arrow Learn more about GBA at www.garybess.com.

Online Giving is Up!

June 15, 2011/0 Comments/in News/by webguy

online-givingAlthough nonprofits have been hurting like the rest of us during these past few years, 2010 saw a significant increase in online giving. According to Blackbaud (they’re the big dogs when it comes to nonprofit consulting) 2010 Giving Report year-over-year growth was 34.5% compared to 2009. Apparently, funds for Haiti relief spiked the data a bit, but online giving nevertheless is very much on the rise. The larger organizations benefitted the most with 55.6% growth compared to 15.9% for smaller organizations – which makes sense since larger organizations can employ stronger web fundraising tools.

How does online fundraising look against other means of income? Well, the percentage of total fundraising that comes from online giving has grown to 7.6%. Since the last analysis of this kind, large organizations have shifted from having the lowest percentage of online dollars to total funds raised to the highest percentage. International Affairs and Health Care sectors now bring in more than 10% of total fundraising from online giving.

Why is online giving becoming popular? It’s simple: donors what to get their donations to work as fast as possible. In the past several years we’ve seen mega-disaster after another, from the Asian Tsunami of 2004 to the Japanese Tsunami of 2011, and when people see a crises they want to help now. Moreover, they now instinctively know to go online rather than pick up the telephone or wait for mailed solicitations. As Blackbaud pointed out, online giving is becoming the first-response method of choice for donors. Major events like the Haiti earthquake are going to continue to increase the use of online and mobile technologies to engage with donors. Nonprofits across all sectors can learn valuable lessons from Haiti and other disaster relief programs and apply them to their fundraising efforts.

Not just small gifts anymore. From the analyzed data it was found that significant online donations have been made for the third consecutive year. In 2010, 88% of nonprofits had at least one online gift of $1,000 or more. This was an increase from 77% in 2009.The largest online gift made in 2010 was $100,000 and there were 10 gifts of this size. This was up from 2009, when the largest online gift was $60,000. The median online gift of $1,000 or more was $1,250.Online gifts of a significant amount are likely to increase and be a greater source of fundraising results for nonprofits.

So, how is your nonprofit faring? Are you taking advantage of Internet tools to your advantage? If you’re not sure, you may wish to click the “Your Website” tab on this site to see what you might be mission. But ask yourself this right now: Are the donation results shared with other sectors of your fundraising team? (E.g.: when you get a large contribution is it fed to your major/corporate gifts person for follow-up?) Are donors immediately added to the mailing list and email alerts? Are you showcasing larger contributions on the website (with permission granted, of course) to inspire others? Are you “Sharing” on Facebook and other social media networks? Within your online appeal, do you offer donation amount suggestions and how that money would be invested? And, do you have sections and/or pages for Planned, Corporate and Major gifts? Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, are you showcasing your appeal prominently? Your Home page should prioritize your need for contributions now, and what it will be used for. Having a compelling image on the top of your Home page with a simple message (e.g.: “Free HIV Testing Program to close. Please give now to ensure it doesn’t.”)

hyper-arrow Should you have any questions or website needs, please feel free to contact us.

Signs that your Nonprofit Needs a New Website

March 23, 2011/1 Comment/in News/by webguy
By Richard Hamel

This morning I came across a clever online (top-ten list) article by Philanthropy Journal regarding when it might be time to redesign an organization’s website and, moreover, how best to approach the organization’s leadership that the time is now. I thought I’d comment on the individual points – plus add an additional key item – before sharing this list with doWW viewers.

As the author of the article pointed out, and I certainly agree, the website is the most cost-effective communication tool a nonprofit has. I’ll add that since few supporters and, perhaps, clients can afford the time to come visit the organization in person, the website really needs to keep the “front lobby up,” as it were. It needs to meet and greet the person like a well informed and caring reception staff. Moreover, the website not only needs to reflect the organizations services, programs and wants, it needs to reflect the organizations vitality and ability to engage the visitor.

Remember, a website is not a digital version of a static brochure, but an interactive venue – a social network between the public and the organization.

That said, now the list:

10. Your website and social media don’t speak the same language and can’t get along.
In other words, the ability to “share” with your social network (e.g.: Facebook, LinkedIn, an email) an article you find interesting is becoming one of the best means of steering traffic to your website. And, of course, traffic equals participation and potential support. Share the wealth of information!

9. Your website assumes that visitors are willing to wait several minutes for everything to load, and doesn’t care that its programming and graphics files are the cause. (Your web statistics indicate that 95 percent of your visitors don’t get past the homepage.)
Skip the bandwidth-heavy flash intro, optimize the graphics to the appropriate file size, and get to the heart of the matter. Also, always keep in mind that the Home page is prime real estate; don’t overwhelm viewers with too much information. Yet, make sure that they can get to where they need to go in no more then 2 clicks.

8. You have absolutely no idea how to log in to make changes and your volunteer website administrator stopped returning your calls six months ago.
Since the website is the organization’s main communication tool to the public, maintenance and content development must be performed with the same regularity as an organization’s scheduled staff meeting. If you rely on a good-hearted volunteer to maintain the site, he/she will have to have not only some basic webmaster skills, but the ability (and this is important) to showcase the organization in the best light possible. They also need to be as reliable as any paid employee or outsourced webmaster. Also, be sure to keep accurate records on how to login to the site and how to make basic alterations should your volunteer (or staff member) disappear.

Finally, keep in mind that just because your website was built as a Content Management System (CMS) which permits client-side alterations, that does not necessarily mean that the person tasked with updating the website will be able to understand CMS procedures and will be able to budget the necessary time to stay on top of the website maintenance.

7. Your nonprofit’s website looks exactly like your brochure, with no more and no less information and photographs.
As stated earlier, the website is not a digital brochure. It is a venue where the public can interact with the organization. It is your communication nerve center.

6. Everything is a downloadable PDF file.
Having someone download a document will tire your visitor faster than a weekend budget meeting. Your important content must be viewable onscreen with minimal loading time.

5. Your homepage reminds you of when you were studying for yours SATs – too much text and information than is possible to digest.
Engage your viewers! Make them want to return! How? It is done by judicially selecting just the right amount of content with appealing graphics and images, and then laying it out in the most user-friendly format possible (think magazine structure). Lead them to additional content from excerpts, and don’t overwhelm them. Finally, offer them the option to comment on an article and share the information with others.

4. It takes visitors, and you, at least three attempts to successfully click your intended selection on a complicated drop-down menu. (Keep trying – you’ll catch that link!)
Not only does your navigation/menu selector have to function properly, it needs to be set up logically and intuitively.

3. An over-zealous intern or volunteer installed a fancy flash introduction that makes your website look like it is for a video game rather than a nonprofit – and that decreases your traffic by 40 percent to 60 percent.
Before you move with your website design, you must go through some sort of branding/market identification process. Serving the needs of the underserved is not the same as selling surfer shorts or plumbing services. Make sure your style, approach and content reflects this critical fact.

2. You completely redesigned your logo and look three years ago, but your website still has the logo and look designed 15 years ago. Again, your website is not an afterthought. It needs to reflect where the organization is NOW. And having an old logo, or a past event, still on the Home page is a major faux pas.

(That said, the creation of a logo is a specialization. It requires skills that are not usually available to even the best graphic designer. Logo creation is the key part of the organizational identity process.)

1. You are being charged by the hour for a web programmer to make all of your changes and updates even though there are free open-source templates with content-management systems built-in. Periodic content updates and new articles do not necessarily require the skills of a webmaster. Keep him/her for the design, structural and back-end work. But if the task of keeping the website current is “falling through the cracks,” some sort of outsourced website maintenance schedule may serve the needs of the organization best.

1+ Your website is almost invisible in the search engines.
If one cannot locate your website because of poor or non-existing search engine optimization (SEO) practices, then you are not marketing. (Your Internet outreach is now Intra-net.) Few things are as important in the development of a website as getting the SEO down right on every page.

 

For more information on website development practices, options and ideas, visit Your Website at doww.

Website Statistics Reporting Discrepancies

August 1, 2010/in News/by webguy
By Richard Hamel

A longtime client of doWW’s came to me with a question regarding their website statistics. The client had noticed an apparent website statistics reporting discrepancy between their server (web host service provider) and the reports that Google Analytics produces for them. Their server reports stated they had Total Visits of more than 4,500 for the previous month. During that same period, Google Analytics stated they had just under 1,000 Total Visits.

The client was, to say the least, very curious.

Since I too had been noticing variances within my own reports (web server and Analytics), I felt some investigating was called for. After a call to the client’s web host provider, which happens to be the same one I use, along with a day of web researching, I learned that discrepancies between the two accurate reporting systems are not only common and significant, but should be expected.

“How’s that possible?” you may be asking.

Well let’s take a look at what the reports do, beginning with server reports.

Website server statistics are reflective of one’s “server logs.” Server log files state, accurately and plainly, how many (and which) pages or files were viewed within a specific time period via the server’s reporting software (such as the popular program Webalizer). The problem here is that the server reports are subject to varying logging standards. They don’t know if it is a person viewing the website or another computer. Furthermore, log files (e.g.: time stamp, filename, requesting IP, and browser type) in themselves do not provide a complete picture. To counteract log file shortcomings, software designers define rules that they believe will distinguish between a visit and a unique visitor. However, this information is never fully accurate, and it is not standardized across different server logs.

In a Nutshell: Log files (which produce server reports) will always give you a higher number of page views, visits, and unique visitors when compared with that of a web-based, JavaScript program such as Google Analytics. And in most cases, experts believe, the numbers on the server reports are too high.

So much for server reports. Now let’s take a look at web-based reports, e.g.: Google Analytics. These differ from the server reports. Since Google is not granted access to your web server, Google tracks your traffic via a JavaScript tag which was placed by your webmaster within your website’s templates to create an external log file. Most also set a cookie to track referring pages, browsing history, and visitor history (first time or repeat). Web-based tracking programs like these more accurately track visits since they track individuals (anonymously) and don’t over-count visits like server logs do. However, they tend to under-count in the process.

Since these tracking systems rely on JavaScript and cookies, there will be a loss in reporting. The reason is simple. Many visitors, for security considerations, disable their cookies or clear their cookies monthly. (The percentage of those doing so varies from as few as 14% to as many as 40%.) What’s more, web-based tracking systems often do not track non-html file downloads well, so if your website’s performance is based on file downloads, your reports will be affected.

In a Nutshell: Web-based programs (e.g.: Analytics) give you a better picture of the visits your website receives, but report numbers usually a lot lower (yet presumably more accurate) than log files. The tradeoff is that users with high security settings may only be partially tracked or not tracked at all and that file downloads are difficult to monitor.

Bottom Line: It is not unusual at all for the server report to produce a visitor count 4-5 times greater than that of Analytics (as was the case with my client). A solution is to add about 20% to the figures reported in the web-based reports (e.g.: Google Analytics). That should give you a more reliable picture of your visitor traffic. Nonetheless, you may not want to dismiss the higher visitor count that server reports generate. The non-person (e.g.: “robot” or “spider”) that was viewing the site/page may have been viewing your website for a good reason, such as better indexing your website and/or position within a search engine.

Sources: DevelopmentSeed.org, SEOmoz.org and Jumpline.com (technical department).

SEO and Good Search Engine Ranking

June 23, 2010/in News/by webguy
By Richard Hamel

I’m often asked by fellow nonprofit professionals which SEO (search engine optimization) practices contribute to better positioning within search engine results, e.g.: Google, Yahoo, Bing. And though years of SEO tricks for elevated organic (i.e. non-placement purchase requirement) results have been offered up by marketing firms (for substantial consultant fees), the fundamentals of producing good ranking has not changed all that much. That said, when it comes right down to it, you simply need to look at some key factors—such as how long your website has been around and is it continuing to produce abundant content. But, it’s not quite that simple. The following are key factors to keep in mind.

Rich content: This is the most important part of a website’s overall position. Larger websites with a lot of content will naturally attract the attention of search engines. Content is why a person seeks your website in the first place; therefore, content is the yardstick by which search engines judge many sites. Moreover, more content means more opportunities for such SEO opportunities as page Titles, Meta Content, and keywords.

Use of Title: The Title (that’s what you see at the head of your browser when you visit a web page) of the web document is considered the key attribute in positioning your page within a search engine. And the key to a good Title is part instinct and part common sense. Your Title should tie-in well with your anticipated best search phrase. That is, the search phase you’d expect a person to type inside a search engine’s search field should be the title of your web page or Home page.

For example: If you’re organization is called “Midtown Homeless Shelter” and you’re located in Los Angeles, it is unlikely that a person would use that particular search phrase to locate your services. Sure “Midtown Homeless Shelter” is the name of your organization, but a search such as that would produce thousands of shelters within thousands of “midtown” locations. Rest assured, however, that since the name of your organization will no doubt be peppered throughout the website, if one elects to search for you by the organization’s name, he or she will still be able to locate you easily. That said, a far more logical Title might be: “Homeless Services in Midtown Los Angeles.” Within the Meta Description you would have: “Midtown Homeless Shelter serves the homeless within the midtown area of Los Angeles, California.”

Use of keywords: When Google (as one prime example) indexes your pages, they take into account the placement of the search phrase on that page. If a phrase is in the page Title, in a big heading (using “h1” header tags) and/or repeated many times on the page, then it is likely to rank higher than a page where the search phrase is not prioritized (e.g.: in smaller font size, mentioned infrequently, and placed at the end of a page).

Age of the Website: The longer your website has been live on the world-wide-web, the higher priority it receives. I often find that a website which has many competitors will usually begin to crawl onto the first page or two of Google within three years, even if they’ve not changed their SEO practices.

Link Popularity and Quality: The more pages and websites link to yours, the higher your ranking will be. And if a website is very large and prestigious (e.g.: The Los Angeles Times, The Journal of Philosophy, et cetera) it carries more weight in the ranking decision. And it’s not just external links that help your ranking. Linking your pages, from one to another, will help your ranking. The use of internal links is very important.

The bottom line is that a website that has plenty of content (the use of a blog provides a great opportunity to produce content and links), has prioritized content, and is cross-linked to other relevant websites will be granted preference in SEO web ranking.

Other significant factors include: the age of your web page (the older, the better), topical relevance with regards to inbound links (a link to another homeless services organization is better than a link to an ice cream shop), and adding content to the “Alt” tags of images.

Organic search engine optimization is vital to the success of any website—especially for the nonprofit ones since bidding for top ranking position is generally cost prohibitive. Rest assured, however, the above stated SEO practices are generally applied to all dot org Web Works productions.

Page 4 of 41234

Recent Posts

  • Web Design for Nonprofits
  • Website Design that Raises Awareness
  • Giving Tuesday 2021
  • 6 Things Your Nonprofit Website Can Be Doing Now For the Holidays Giving Period
  • Donate Your Stimulus Check?

Categories

  • Ad Announcement
  • App Spotlight
  • Archived
  • Featured
  • How-to
  • News
  • Portfolio
  • Special
  • Put Me On The Email List

  • Visit Us on Facebook

  • Contact Us

Special Offer on Maintenance
LIMITED TIME OFFER
Get 3 Months of Free Website Maintenance.

About Us | Our Best Non profit Websites | Non Profit Web Development | Non Profit Website Builder

DOWW Logo

Dot Org Web Works, the intelligent way to get your cause and services noticed is to use website design professionals who are also nonprofit professionals.
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
© Copyright 2000-2022 - Dot Org Web Works | Created by: dot org Web Works
Scroll to top